SwarmGlass Status Surface

SwarmGlass governance framework — current truth, weekly evidence, and bridge readiness.

This front door is presentation-only. SwarmGlass is the governance layer (formerly HLF). The HLF DSL is gated behind SWARMGLASS_EXPERIMENTAL=1. 141 governance tools always-on (59 sg_* + 82 hlf_*), 193 total with experimental=1. DSL isolation verified — zero compiler/runtime/bytecode loaded in governance mode.

Overall readiness
67.8%
bridge-active

Strongest cluster: semantic core. DSL isolation: CLEAN. Main drag: coordination and operator systems.

Lane Reading Bands

Current truth, bridge truth, and still-open posture
Lane reading

Current-True

Current-True

Packaged language, runtime, governance, and MCP surfaces are materially real now.

Strongest pillar: Deterministic language core at 92.5%.

Lane reading

Bridge-True

Bridge-True

Coordination, operator, and recovery work is real; Instinct proof-state and mission-lineage surfaces are now packaged, but broader coordination promotion still requires explicit qualification.

Weekly governed evidence now includes a stronger Instinct operator proof contract, but multi-agent coordination recovery still belongs here until it earns stricter packaged truth.

Lane reading

Still-Open

Still-Open

Lower-scoring pillars are still architecture obligations, not aesthetic gaps to hide with polish.

Weakest pillar: Orchestration lifecycle and plan execution at 53.5%.

Whole SwarmGlass Status

Current repo posture
Semantic core
73.0%

strongly improved — type universe + grammar completion + capability manifests

Governance and trust
70.2%

constitutional checks + constitutive verification gating now operational

Coordination and operator systems
42.3%

improved via two-channel execution and manifest-gated orchestration, still the drag

Top-line readiness is an internal indicator. It helps operators read repo posture, but it does not collapse current truth, weekly proof, and bridge recovery into one completion claim.

Trend Micrographics

Only where comparison is honest
Signal
Overall readiness
baseline
Current 64.7% Previous n/a

first committed readiness snapshot in the current docs set

Weekly Operational Results

Governed evidence lanes
Lane Latest reading Owner Triage Status Artifact
No committed weekly artifacts were found in this checkout. Local-only governed runs may still exist outside the repository.

Weekly rows are evidence summaries. They show live governed workflow behavior, but they are not stand-ins for whole-repo completion.

Artifact paths under observability/local_validation/... are example/local-only governed-run locations and are not checked into this repository.

Strongest and Weakest Pillars

Where the repo actually leads or lags
Type Pillar Score Reading
Strongest Deterministic language core 92.5% strongest combination of implementation, proof, and repo integration; type universe fully expanded, grammar complete
Strongest Runtime and capsule-bounded execution 85.0% real packaged runtime with two-channel execution and strong proof surface
Strongest Governance-native execution 70.2% 4 constitutional rules wired; DSL isolation clean at EXP=0; 141 always-on governance tools
Weakest Orchestration lifecycle and plan execution 53.5% two-channel dispatch exists but plan-level lifecycle management still lacks end-to-end proof
Weakest Ecosystem integration surface 22.5% MCP + REST bridges built and tested, but integration depth still needs hardening
Weakest Gallery and operator-legibility surface 58.0% 12 fixtures with 6-surface round-trip, 48.6% avg compression, operatorization ongoing

Per-Pillar Readiness

Readiness strips instead of flat score-only rows
Deterministic language core
92.5%
Deterministic language core
Runtime and capsule-bounded execution
85.0%
Runtime and capsule-bounded execution
Governance-native execution
70.2%
Governance-native execution
Typed effect and capability algebra
68.0%
Typed effect and capability algebra
Human-readable audit and trust layer
60.5%
Human-readable audit and trust layer
Real-code bridge
45.5%
Real-code bridge
Knowledge substrate and governed memory
56.0%
Knowledge substrate and governed memory
Formal verification surface
68.5%
Formal verification surface
Gateway and routing fabric
51.0%
Gateway and routing fabric
Orchestration lifecycle and plan execution
53.5%
Orchestration lifecycle and plan execution
Persona and operator doctrine
45.0%
Persona and operator doctrine
Ecosystem integration surface
22.5%
Ecosystem integration surface
Gallery and operator-legibility surface
58.0%
Gallery and operator-legibility surface

These strips remain evidence-backed score renderings. They do not replace the underlying readiness tables in the markdown authority.

Reviewer Decision Panel

What a PR reader should conclude from the generated status front door
What is real now
current-true

SwarmGlass governance core is inspectable and usable now.

strongly improved — type universe + grammar completion + capability manifests

What is improved in branch
bridge-true

Weekly evidence and operator recovery lanes sharpen branch posture.

Governed weekly evidence remains part of the branch signal.

What is still missing
still-open

Orchestration lifecycle and plan execution

two-channel dispatch exists but plan-level lifecycle management still lacks end-to-end proof

What is safe to claim publicly
claim-lane

Strong core, real evidence, unfinished recovery.

Public wording should keep packaged truth, weekly proof, and broader architectural recovery distinct.

Governance Trust Path

Clarify trust, do not beautify ambiguity
1

Observe

Evidence enters the governed lane as recorded operator or workflow truth.

2

Propose

Bridge work becomes explicit rather than implied by attractive wording.

3

Verify

Tests, audits, and provenance decide whether the proposal is promotable.

4

Promote

Only the surfaces that earn current-truth wording move into public-safe claims.

This is a static doctrinal explainer, not a claim that every upstream governance path is fully restored in packaged form.

What Moves The Score Next

Bridge work with leverage
  1. Strengthen typed effect and capability contracts.
  2. Deepen formal verification and routing proof.
  3. Extend shipped Instinct proof-state and mission-lineage evidence into thicker packaged coordination proof.
  4. Convert persona and operator doctrine into thicker workflow and runtime evidence.
  5. Keep memory governance and weekly evidence contracts converging without fragmenting the trust surface.

Source Provenance

Operator-facing generation trace
markdown source HLF_STATUS_OVERVIEW.md watermark 2026-03-20T00:00:00Z

This page is rendered from the generated markdown status source, which is itself derived from the repo authorities listed inside that markdown file.